Exam 642-887 | Question id=3195 | QOS in a Service Provider IP NGN Environment |
Refer to the Cisco IOS XR policy-map configuration exhibit.
policy-map test
!
class one
priority level 1
!
class two
priority level 2
!
class three
bandwidth percent 60
!
interface GigabitEthernet0/0/0/2
service-policy output test
!
What is wrong with the policy-map configuration?
A. |
missing the priority percent command under class one and class two | |
B. |
missing the police command under class one and class two | |
C. |
missing the police command under class three | |
D. |
missing the priority bandwidth command under class one and class two | |
E. |
missing the bandwidth command under class one and class two |
Hierarchical policing is also supported. In such a configuration, both parent and child policies have class-maps
containing policing statements, as in the following example:
!
policy-map child
class gold
police rate percent 50 conform-action set precedence immediate exceed-action drop
!
!
policy-map parent
class match_all
police rate 10000 kbps burst 15000 exceed-action drop
service-policy child