Refer to the exhibit.
RP/0/0/CPU0:XR3#show bgp 10.11.11.0
Thu Jun 20:06:24:45.649 UTC
BGP routing table entry for 10.11.11.0/24
Versions:
Process bRIB/RIB SendTblVer
Speaker 9 9
Paths: (2 available, best #2)
Advertised to update-groups (with more than one peer):
0.1
Path #1: Received by speaker 0
Not advertised to any peer
1
10.0.0.9 from 10.0.0.9 (192.168.0.1)
Origin IGP, metric 0, localpref 100, valid, external
Received Path ID 0, Local Path ID 0, version 0
Origin-AS validity: not-found
Path #2: Received by speaker 0
Advertised to update-groups (with more than one peer):
0.1
1
10.0.0.13 from 10.0.0.13 (192.168.0.2)
Origin IGP, metric 0, localpref 100, weight 651, valid, external, best, group-best
Received Path ID 0, Local Path ID 0, version 9
A network operator is getting the route for 10.11.11 0/24 from two upstream providers on #XR3. The network operator must configure #XR3 to force the 10.11.11.0/24 prefix to route via next hop of 10.0.0.9 as primary when available. Which of these can the operator use the routing policy language for, to enforce this traffic forwarding path?