Refer to the exhibit.
RP/0/0/CPU0:XR3#show bgp 10.11.11.0 Thu Jun 20:06:24:45.649 UTC BGP routing table entry for 10.11.11.0/24 Versions: Process bRIB/RIB SendTblVer Speaker 9 9 Paths: (2 available, best #2) Advertised to update-groups (with more than one peer): 0.1 Path #1: Received by speaker 0 Not advertised to any peer 1 10.0.0.9 from 10.0.0.9 (192.168.0.1) Origin IGP, metric 0, localpref 100, valid, external Received Path ID 0, Local Path ID 0, version 0 Origin-AS validity: not-found Path #2: Received by speaker 0 Advertised to update-groups (with more than one peer): 0.1 1 10.0.0.13 from 10.0.0.13 (192.168.0.2) Origin IGP, metric 0, localpref 100, weight 651, valid, external, best, group-best Received Path ID 0, Local Path ID 0, version 9
A network operator is getting the route for 10.11.11 0/24 from two upstream providers on #XR3. The network operator must configure #XR3 to force the 10.11.11.0/24 prefix to route via next hop of 10.0.0.9 as primary when available. Which of these can the operator use the routing policy language for, to enforce this traffic forwarding path?